Issues : Errors of FC
|
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 13, Prelude in F♯ major
..
The longer chord in the 2nd half of the bar must be Fontana's mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
||||||||
|
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 13, Prelude in F♯ major
..
The missing pedalling markings are one of a few oversights of the copyist in this Prelude. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
||||||||
|
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 13, Prelude in F♯ major
..
The slur of A, although perfectly visible, was, nevertheless, overlooked both in FC (→GE) and FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC |
||||||||
|
b. 14-16
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 13, Prelude in F♯ major
..
In A the phrase mark in b. 15, which opens a new line, is ambiguous – it starts over the 1st chord, but its shape indicates that it should be a continuation. The ending of the phrase mark in b. 14, dragged far beyond the bar line, is an argument for a continuous phrase mark, which we give in the main text. Therefore, we consider the division of the phrase mark in FE (→EE) to be an erroneous interpretation of A. In turn, in FC Fontana reproduced the continuous phrase mark in b. 14-15 correctly, but he marked its continuation between b. 15 and 16 very inaccurately (b. 16 opens a new line in FC), hence the version of A cannot be guessed on this basis. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A , Errors of FC , Uncertain slur continuation |
||||||||
|
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 13, Prelude in F♯ major
..
In the main text we keep Chopin's original notation, in which it is only the e category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Different values of chord components , GE revisions , Errors of FC |
1 note that was provided with a dot, in spite of the fact that the entire chord was written on one stem. The copyist of